QuackeryWatch ← Bad MD Files

Bad MD Files · Connecticut · Consent Order 2011

Dr. Jarir Nakouzi: Homeopathy and “Bioresonance” for Late-Stage Cancer

A Bridgeport, Connecticut internist who trained in oncology told a desperate husband he could cure his wife's metastatic breast cancer. The treatment — homeopathic remedies, supplements and a skin-resistance device — cost more than $40,000. She died. Four years later the state medical board put him on probation and barred him from offering unproven cancer treatment.

QuackeryWatch.com · Bad MD Files · Rebuilt from this site's 2008 cancer archive, October 2026

What happened

In the summer of 2006 Mary Nedlouf's breast cancer came back and could not be operated on. Late that year, with her in and out of consciousness, her husband Said went looking for anything that might save her and found Dr. Jarir Nakouzi, who told him he could cure her cancer.

What followed was what Newsweek later described as about $3,000 a week for “bioresonance therapy”, “quadrant analysis” and “autosanguis” treatments: homeopathic remedies, supplements, and a device that measured the electrical resistance of the skin and was presented as both diagnosis and treatment. Over the course of it the family's bills passed $40,000. None of it worked. Mary Nedlouf died in early 2007, at 42.

A year later Said Nedlouf told Newsweek that the doctor had sold them hope that was not there, and that he had complained to the Connecticut Department of Public Health. In the same article the acting deputy director of the U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine said that, to his knowledge, there was no condition for which homeopathy had been proven effective.

What the board did

Four and a half years. Mary Nedlouf died early in 2007. The order that stopped the treatments she was given came in September 2011. Connecticut's own investigative reporters later used this case to show how slowly the state's doctor-discipline process moved. The restriction itself was the right one; it came too late for her.

Why it matters in Canada

The device at the centre of this case — a skin-resistance meter sold as “bioresonance” — is the same family of machine documented in this site's electrodermal screening file, still offered in Canadian clinics. Connecticut banned one physician from using it on cancer patients. No Canadian regulator has published a comparable decision naming such a device; the regulatory tables set out the gap. Compare too the Ontario finding against Dr. Akbar Khan over unproven cancer treatment.

Whether Dr. Nakouzi completed probation and what he practises today has not been checked for this page.

Related

Sources

  1. Jerry Adler. “No way to treat the dying.” Newsweek, 4 February 2008.
  2. Connecticut Medical Examining Board. Minutes, 2011 (15 February, 16 August and 20 September meetings), Petition No. 2007-0424-001-060.
  3. Stephen Barrett, MD. “Jarir Nakouzi, M.D. facing disciplinary action” and “Jarir Nakouzi, M.D. placed on probation (2011).” Quackwatch / Casewatch.
  4. Colleen McKown and Lisa Chedekel. “Delays hamper state's doctor discipline process.” Connecticut Health Investigative Team, 16 June 2013.
  5. Connecticut physician licence record, as recorded on this site in 2008.

This file rests on the Connecticut Medical Examining Board's Consent Order of 20 September 2011. A consent order is a settlement; this page does not suggest any finding beyond its terms. Corrections are welcome and are recorded on the page.