← QuackeryWatch

Bad Devices

Machines sold as diagnostic instruments that cannot diagnose anything — what is claimed for them, what testing shows, and what Canadian regulators have and have not done about them.

The other case-file sections on this site are organised around people. This one is organised around hardware.

There is a reason for the distinction. A device outlives any individual practitioner. It gets rebranded, resold, imported through a different channel, and taken up by a new cohort who have never heard of the last regulatory action against it. The Vegatest of the 1990s is the electrodermal screening system of the 2020s under another name. Documenting the machine, and the paper trail attached to it, is more durable than documenting whoever happens to be operating one this year.

How this differs from the other sections. Bad-MD and Bad-ND cover physicians and naturopaths with adjudicated adverse findings — a regulator or a court has made a finding against them. Dubious Rx covers unproven treatments and practitioners who have not been found guilty of anything. Bad Devices covers the instrument itself. A device is documented here on the strength of the evidence about the device and the public regulatory record concerning it — not on the basis of any finding against any individual who uses one. Where individual practitioners are named on these pages, their actual status is stated, including where no finding of misconduct exists.

Device investigations

How it gets here, and how it was sold

The regulatory record

In preparation

General resource — where concerns go. These are general routes available to anyone, about any product or practitioner, and are not directed at anyone named in this section.