QuackeryWatch.com

Canadian Quackery Watch — documenting health fraud, since the 1990s
Case summary: Once considered Canada's leading expert in pediatric forensic pathology, Dr. Charles Smith gave flawed, overreaching expert testimony in child-death cases for over a decade — testimony that helped send at least 13 innocent parents and caregivers to prison before a public inquiry exposed the scale of his errors.

Dr. Charles Smith: The Pathologist Whose Flawed Autopsies Sent Innocent Parents to Prison

Charles Randal Smith served as chief forensic pathologist at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children from 1982 to 2003, performing more than 1,000 child autopsies over his career and becoming the province's de facto go-to expert witness in suspicious child-death cases. In 2002 he was reprimanded with a caution by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) over his handling of three suspicious-death cases, and in 2003 he was removed from performing further autopsies.

The Coroner's Review and the Goudge Inquiry

In June 2005, Ontario's chief coroner ordered a formal review of 45 child autopsies in which Smith had concluded the cause of death was homicide or criminally suspicious; 13 of those cases had already resulted in criminal convictions. The review, released in April 2007, found Smith had reached questionable conclusions of foul play in 20 of the 45 cases. Ontario's attorney general immediately announced a full public inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in the province.

The inquiry, led by Justice Stephen Goudge of the Ontario Court of Appeal, began hearing evidence in November 2007 and released its report in October 2008. Goudge found that over a ten-year span, Smith had "actively misled" his superiors, made false and misleading statements in court, and repeatedly exaggerated the extent of his expertise while testifying — while also finding that Smith's superiors, including then-chief coroner Dr. James Young and deputy chief coroner Dr. Jim Cairns, had moved "far too late" to rein him in despite mounting concerns. The report made 169 recommendations for reforming how child deaths are investigated. Smith told the inquiry his errors had never been intentional; Goudge rejected that framing outright, writing, "I simply cannot accept such a sweeping attempt to escape moral responsibility."

Wrongful Convictions

Smith's testimony contributed directly to the wrongful prosecution or conviction of numerous parents and caregivers. William Mullins-Johnson spent twelve years in prison for the rape and murder of his four-year-old niece before being exonerated; the province later paid him $4.25 million in compensation. Tammy Marquardt spent fourteen years in prison after being convicted in 1995 of killing her two-year-old son, a conviction the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned in 2011. Brenda Waudby was wrongly accused of murdering her two-year-old daughter based on Smith's analysis. By 2011, Ontario's highest court had set aside at least five convictions tied in part to Smith's evidence, with several more appeals still pending at the time. The Ontario government subsequently established a compensation program for those affected, offering up to $250,000 for a wrongfully accused individual, up to $25,000 for a child removed from the family home as a result, and up to $12,500 for other directly affected family members, along with reimbursement of legal costs.

Licence Revoked

Smith had not practised medicine since his registration expired in August 2008. In February 2011, a CPSO disciplinary panel formally stripped him of his licence. Smith did not attend the hearing but pleaded no contest through his lawyer to disgraceful conduct and incompetence, and did not contest the penalty. Several of his victims, including Mullins-Johnson and Maria Shepherd — whose own wrongful conviction was later reopened — called the licence revocation and reprimand an inadequate response, saying they wanted to see Smith face criminal charges or imprisonment himself. No such charges were ever laid against him.

Timeline

Sources